On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:41:12 +0000
Richard Huxton <d...@archonet.com> wrote:

> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:19:51 +0000
> > Richard Huxton <d...@archonet.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Igor Katson wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to watch all dependencies recursively without
> >>> doing a drop?
> > 
> >> BEGIN;
> >> DROP CASCADE...
> >> -- check things
> >> ROLLBACK;
> > 
> > Isn't it going to be a pretty expensive way to see?

> Not necessarily - you're not likely to have a lot of concurrency
> on a backup database. And we are all testing this sort of stuff on
> a backup database, aren't we?

Isn't it going to be expensive even if there is no concurrency?

mvcc should be pretty efficient to rollback transactions but... well
it should have a cost anyway... and you add deleting to rolling
back, not just traversing some schema somehow.

Surely recursively traversing a schema may be expensive in termos of
programming time if there is no pre-build function.

-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to