Merlin Moncure <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about
>> this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we
>> rename it to char1 or something like that? (With some sort of backward
>> compatibility hack, like a domain named "char".)
> domains are out, unless arrays of domains are addressed first.
[ raised eyebrow... ] You've got apps that depend on array of "char"?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
