* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Hmm ... a gig here, a gig there, pretty soon you're talking about real > memory? He's got several sorts and hashes that are each taking over > 100MB according to the memory context dump, so it seems impossible that > it all fits into a strict 32-bit address space. There's surely no harm > in double-checking the executable's file type though.
Argh, it's late and I'm not thinking. Yeah, I had seen the 100M hashes
and just wasn't thinking clearly. Sorry for the noise.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
