On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:30 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2009-02-18, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
"Brent Wood" <b.w...@niwa.co.nz> writes:
Perhaps \o+ as a future fix for this?
I'd prefer "\o >>file" but maybe I'm too steeped in unix-isms.
\o+ is reasonably consistent with the other \ command usages...
Not really; none of the other commands interpret + as meaning
"append to
an existing file". They tend to take it as meaning "do something *in
addition to* what you normally do", not to do something that is
significantly different from the base command.
Yes, also if \o already supports | why not other plumbing symbols
like >> and for completeness > (also possibly >& filedescriptor?)
I like that. Specifying other file descriptors (e.g. 2>) and
redirecting output from on fd to another (#>&) would be nice.
Erik Jones, Database Administrator
Engine Yard
Support, Scalability, Reliability
866.518.9273 x 260
Location: US/Pacific
IRC: mage2k
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
