Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> It looks like an index using text_pattern_ops can be used for equality
> (see my test case below).
This is true as of 8.4; prior versions make a distinction between =
and ~=~.
> This works apparently because texteq() is defined as bitwise-equality.
> Is that really correct? I was under the impression that some locales do
> not obey that rule, and may consider two slightly different strings to
> be equal.
The locale might, but Postgres doesn't --- look at the implementation
of texteq().
There is actually some history here; the former distinction in the
equality operators arose from exactly your concern. But after we
put in the second-pass check to insist on bitwise equality, we
realized that the equality operators really were equivalent.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
