Kashmir <kashmir_us_1...@yahoo.com> writes:
> being a sql-lamer, i used some query builder help to build my query (which
> served me quite well in the past for all my 'complicated' sqls), and was
> suggested for f_rrd_id=444 to use something as:
> SELECT
> td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_timestamp,
> td_fetch_by_rrd_id.f_ds,
> td_fetch_by_rrd_id.f_ds,
> td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_ds,
> td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_us
> FROM td_fetch_by_rrd_id
> RIGHT JOIN td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id ON
> td_fetch_by_rrd_id.f_timestamp=td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_timestamp
> WHERE td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_rrd_id=444
> ORDER BY td_fetch1m_by_rrd_id.f_timestamp;
Seems like that should be a LEFT JOIN, if you're expecting there to be
missing values in td_fetch_by_rrd_id rather than the other. The WHERE
and ORDER BY clauses don't look right either unless LEFT was meant.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
