On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > David Fetter escribió: >> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:10:18PM -0300, Emanuel Calvo Franco wrote: >> > Hi all. >> > >> > I'll make this faster. >> > >> > I hace this table and this function: >> >> You should only ever assume that your SELECT's output will have a >> particular ordering when you include an ORDER BY clause that actually >> specifies the order well enough :) > > Yeah, we went over this on the spanish list, turned out that I couldn't > remember about syncscan :-)
I like the new behavior. It really encourages proper use of order by, because the natural ordering results are effectively randomized. A class of subtle bugs has been made obvious. :) merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
