Hi,

       I am running Postgres 8.3.7 on Windows 2003 with my java
application.Off late, the server crashes with the following trace:

*2009-07-01 14:47:07.250 ISTPANIC:  failed to add item to the right sibling
in index "mevservices2_ndx"*

*2009-07-01 14:47:07.250 ISTSTATEMENT:  insert into
MEVSERVICES(NSIP,EPTIME,VSVRSVCNAME,VSVRNAME,VSVRSVCENTITYTYPE) values
($1,$2,$3,$4,$5)*



This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual
way.

Please contact the application's support team for more information.



*2009-07-01 14:47:08.609 ISTLOG:  server process (PID 2204) exited with exit
code 3*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.609 ISTLOG:  terminating any other active server
processes*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.640 ISTWARNING:  terminating connection because of
crash of another server process*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.640 ISTDETAIL:  The postmaster has commanded this
server process to roll back the current transaction and exit, because
another server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared
memory.*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.640 ISTHINT:  In a moment you should be able to
reconnect to the database and repeat your command.*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.687 ISTWARNING:  terminating connection because of
crash of another server process*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.687 ISTDETAIL:  The postmaster has commanded this
server process to roll back the current transaction and exit, because
another server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared
memory.*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.687 ISTHINT:  In a moment you should be able to
reconnect to the database and repeat your command.*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.828 ISTWARNING:  terminating connection because of
crash of another server process*

*2009-07-01 14:47:08.828 ISTDETAIL:  The postmaster has commanded this
server process to roll back the current transaction and exit, because
another server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared
memory.*

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

   The index is defined on a column of type varchar(100) . Is this is a bug
in postgres and is this related to the discussion mentioned in the thread
below:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org/msg87557.html

 Thanks.

Reply via email to