In article <[email protected]>, Sam Mason <[email protected]> writes:
> I've just had a look and PG does actually seem to be returning values as > I'd expect, i.e. 0 <= n < 1. That's what everyone would expect. If it's really implemented like that the documentation is wrong, isn't it? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
