Chris Bowlby <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks for the response. I've run into situations where the database
> has also been removed just before pg_autovacuum was about to check, and
> there by kicks out an error (mainly an aesthetic issue, not really a
> functional issue).
That was fixed some time ago. It's not an argument for adding a
"feature" like this.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
