On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:57:45AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Randal L.
> Schwartz<mer...@stonehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Clemens" == Clemens Schwaighofer <clemens_schwaigho...@e-gra.co.jp> 
> >>>>>> writes:
> >
> > Clemens> Just in my opinion, this regex is completely too large. For basic
> > Clemens> validating something like:
> > Clemens> 
> > ^[A-Za-z0-9!#$%&'*+-\/=?^_`{|}~][A-Za-z0-9!#$%&'*+-\/=?^_`{|}~\.]{0,6...@[a-za-z0-9-]+(\.[a-zA-Z0-9-]{1,})*\.([a-zA-Z]{2,4}){1}$
> > Clemens> works very well
> >
> > Fails on ".mobile" TLD.  Has a pointless {1} in it, which does
> > absolutely nothing, providing that the creator of the regex was already
> > missing a few clues.
> 
> Remonds me of the saying that for every complex problem there is a
> simple, elegant and incorrect solution.

That's from H. L. Mencken.

    For every complex problem, there is an answer which is clear,
    simple, and wrong.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to