Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here.
>> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we
>> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot.
> The attached patch implements this. I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD
> shortly.
Looks sane. Can we add a short regression test sequence that checks
for this?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
