On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Tim Landscheidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Hunsberger <[email protected]> wrote: > > After some tests with a data set of 7983 rows (and 1638 ran- > ges): Don't! :-) The recursive solution seems to be more > than double as slow as the iterative. I'll take it to -per- > formance. >
Interesting, I've never liked recursive on Oracle but performance is usually reasonable... Thanks for the heads up... -- Peter Hunsberger -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
