On Friday 25 December 2009 10:27:09 am Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Adrian Klaver wrote: > >> although I don't know why it didn't bite on 8.2 unless it's specifically > >> when 64-bit timestamps are processed. > > > > You might want to confirm your 8.4 installation is using integer > > datetimes as there is some variability in its useage among packagers. > > Follow this thread for one such discussion: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-07/msg01119.php > > Thanks Adrian, noted. I'm hoping to get onto 8.4 before too long because > of the analytic functions but that thread suggests that the best course > of action would be to make sure that my code is robust against the new > server and then decide on an upgrade schedule. > > I'm building from scratch here so all options are as default except for > added Perl. > > --
Alright then, nothing worse then trying to fix a problem that does not exist :) One other thing that came to mind in regards to the the 'changed record' problem is whether Row Versioning has been checked in the ODBC connection parameters? -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
