Konrad Garus escribió: > 2010/1/8 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > > So, no wraparound problem ... odder and odder. Could we see the whole > > -i -f printout for that block? You trimmed some of it before, > > particularly the block header. > > Attached. > > Since data on disk looks correct, is it possible to diagnose it on a > higher level? Could the damage be done by vacuum?
I'm a bit surprised by the block numbers in the block header vs. t_self ... I would have guessed that they come from a different segment (and the numbers seem to match, as 603713 % 131072 = 79425), but Konrad doesn't seem to be using the foo.4 file. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
