Xi Shen <davidshe...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> what if you insert other values like '1', '999'? will the insertion
> successful? if so, what's the difference between a deferred reference
> and no reference at all?
Nice question ;-)
Okay, recreate the table but without NOT NULL:
test=# CREATE TABLE refers ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR(255) NOT
NULL, parent_id INTEGER , FOREIGN KEY (parent_id) REFERENCES refers(id)
deferrable initially deferred);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "refers_id_seq" for serial
column "refers.id"
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "refers_pkey"
for table "refers"
CREATE TABLE
Zeit: 63,477 ms
test=*# insert into refers (name, parent_id) values ('xxx',null);
INSERT 0 1
Zeit: 0,686 ms
I think, NULL is more sensible than inserting a 'random' value like 0.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
