2010/1/27 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it> writes: >> But why still on separate schema? >> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." >> anymore. >> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ... > > If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just > like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema. >
I have not problem with it. Code to contrib module can be more modificated. Current code is for pgfoundry and I prefer some separation. regards Pavel > But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core. > Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed? > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
