Greg Smith wrote: > Cyril Scetbon wrote: > > Does anyone know what can be the differences between linux kernels > > 2.6.29 and 2.6.30 that can cause this big difference (TPS x 7 !) > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2624_2633&num=2 > > Discussed in detail at > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4b512d0d.4030...@2nd > quadrant.com > > The short version is that ext3 combined with regular hard drives has > never been safe for database use by default, it was cheating on writes > in a way that left it possible for corruption to occur after a crash. > The change in ext4 that caused the performance drop is from the kernel > developers finally eliminating the source for that cheat. The result > should be reliable operation by default, which unfortunately happens to > be much slower operation by default too.
Maybe that question is dumb, but why should a change in ext4 have an impact on a figure that was generated with ext3? To quote the link: "the PostgreSQL performance atop the EXT3 file-system has fallen off a cliff" Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
