Jeff Amiel <becauseimj...@yahoo.com> writes:
> New one yesterday.
> Jun 7 15:05:01 db-1 postgres[9334]: [ID 748848 local0.crit] [3989781-1]
> 2010-06-07 15:05:01.087 CDT 9334PANIC: right sibling 169 of block 168 is
> not next child of 249 in index "sl_seqlog_idx"
In your original report you mentioned that the next autovacuum attempt
on the same table succeeded without incident. Has that been true each
time? I wonder whether this is some transient state, rather than actual
corruption that you need to REINDEX to recover from.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
