On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:27 AM, David Wilson <david.t.wil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Leonardo F <m_li...@yahoo.it> wrote: >> >> > For "inserts" I do not see the reason >> > why >> > it would be better to use index partitioning because AFAIK >> > b-tree >> > would behave exactly the same in both cases. >> >> no, when the index gets very big inserting random values gets >> very slow. > > Do you have any empirical evidence for this being a real problem, or are you > simply guessing? I have tables with 500m+ rows, on commodity hardware (4 > SATA disks in raid 10), and inserts to the indexes on those tables remain > quite acceptable from a performance standpoint. >
Can you define acceptable? IIRC the OP is looking for 20,000+ inserts / sec. -- Peter Hunsberger -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
