Hey Massa, Again, I suggest PQlibVersion() or PQversion() instead of PQlibpqVersion().
Why this "pq" redundancy in name? Waste of bytes. 2010/10/14 Massa, Harald Armin <c...@ghum.de> > And the dynamic linker will take any version of libpq.so that has the same >> major number, meaning that you >> cannot assume that it's not 8.4 just because you built against 9.0. >> >> [...] > >> Not to mention when you're on windows (and I dunno if any other >> platforms are like *that*), where they're all libpq.dll and we'll >> happily take *any* other libpq.dll (even an older one, but that will give >> you an error if you're actually using any functions not present in it). >> >> So there are quite many arguments for adding a > > PQlibpqVersion() > > to libpq, yeah? Do you think you will do it, Magnus? > > [updates: the other "got bitten by the BYTEA-encoding-change"-thread is > connected to this....] > > Best wishes, > > Harald > > -- > GHUM GmbH > Harald Armin Massa > Spielberger Straße 49 > 70435 Stuttgart > 0173/9409607 > > Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 734971 > - > persuadere. > et programmare > -- // Dmitriy.
