* Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz:

> 2010/11/24 Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de>:
>> * Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz:
>>
>>> just never use SELECT *, but always call columns by names. You'll
>>> avoid having to depend on the order of columns, which is never
>>> guaranteed, even if the table on disk is one order, the return columns
>>> could be in some other.
>>
>> This can't be true because several SQL features rely on deterministic
>> column order.  Here's an example:
>>
>> SELECT 1 AS a, 2 AS b UNION SELECT 3 AS b, 4 AS a;
>>
>>  a | b
>> ---+---
>>  1 | 2
>>  3 | 4
>> (2 rows)

> Yes, most DBs do a good job to keep it consistent, but they don't have
> to. So unless you specify column names explicitly (like you did in the
> example above), there's no guarantees.

If the database looked at the column names, the result would be
(1, 2), (4, 3), not (1, 2), (3, 4).

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fwei...@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to