On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > [ shrug... ] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess. To me the > search_path change seems like the natural way to do that, and flipping a > mess of synonyms the hack. What happens when you miss one synonym? >
That's exactly what I thought when I read it, too. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
