Thanks. Probably, but that's not the point here. The issue here is how PostgreSQL backend process uses memory and I wonder if there any way to configure it.
-- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-backend-process-high-memory-usage-issue-tp4289407p4289550.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
