In response to Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli.t...@gmail.com>: > > We use the fine Bucardo check_postgres Nagios plugin, > and it reported a "CRITICAL" level spike in database locks > (171 locks). > > I looked closely at my database logs and found an even bigger spike > just a few minutes earlier (208 locks). > > I saw 8 EXCLUSIVE locks on table X. All of these queries completed > within 5 seconds. (I know that because they do not appear in my > slow query log.)
What manner did you use to determine this? It's not possible to have multiple table-level EXCLUSIVE locks on a single table, since a single table level EXCLUSIVE lock will cause other lock attempts to block. However, it's possible to have multiple row-level EXCLUSIVE locks, 1 per row. Did the mysterious magic that you used to determine that there were 8 EXCLUSIVE locks tell you whether they were table level or row level? If they're table level, then something is wrong either with PostgreSQL or your magic. If they're row level, then that's hardly unusual. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
