Merlin Moncure-2 wrote:
> 
> One proposed solution is to cache plpgsql plans around the search path.  
> 

I like the proposed solution, since search_path plays a part when generating
plpgsql plan, it make sense to be part of the cache.


Merlin Moncure-2 wrote:
> 
> *) use sql functions for portions that float across schemas 
> 

Just to clarify, does this mean the sql functions doesn't cache plans like
plpgsql functions do?



--
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/plpgsql-function-confusing-behaviour-tp4576354p4579619.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to