On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> The simplest seems to me to be a sequence and use nextval() to populate
>> the null values. The major advantage would be that the sequence could stay
>> around in case you need it again. So for example:
>>
>> create sequence my_varchar_values;
>
>> UPDATE my_table set my_varchar =
>> nextval('my_varchar_values')::varchar(12) where my_varchar IS NULL;
>
> Chris,
>
> I was wondering if this was the best approach since I have new data to add
> to the table. Don't need a starting value, eh?
>
>
TBH, it's the approach I would use. It creates one additional
database object but the queries are simpler and thus more
maintainable.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
