On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:51:32PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> 
> @andrew s: going SERIALIZABLE doesn't help if you trying to eliminate
> cases that would push you into retrying the transaction.

Well, no, of course.  But why not catch the failure and retry?  I
guess I just don't get the problem, since I hear people say this all
the time.  (I mean, I've also seen places where 'upsert' would be
cool, but it doesn't seem trivial to do in a general way and you can
do this with catch-serialization-error-and-retry, I think?)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to