Greg Jaskiewicz <[email protected]> writes:
> On 18 Oct 2011, at 20:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm. The reason for that is that the table types aren't considered
>> dumpable objects. I suppose we need to fix that, but in the meantime
>> you'd have better luck if you created the types as composite types
>> instead of implicit table rowtypes.
> Maybe worth adding to the TODO.
If I hadn't done it yesterday, maybe so.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
