--- On Fri, 12/2/11, David Johnston <pol...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: David Johnston <pol...@yahoo.com> > --------------------------------------------------------- > My, possibly naïve, observation: > > So aside from the fact the estimates seem to be off the > planner has still > chosen the most effective plan? In that situation no > matter how accurate > you get the statistics you will not gain any performance > because the planner > will never choose a different plan. > Thanks..... I'm not interested in optimizing this query.....it's fast and efficient. However, the planner thinks that it is going to return a million rows when it is only going to return one thousand. When this query is used as an element of a BIGGER query, that causes me all sorts of planner issues.... That's the problem I am trying to solve...why the planner is 3 orders of magnitude off in row estimation. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
