* Christoph Zwerschke (c...@online.de) wrote: > (Btw, what negative consequences - if any - does it have if I set > kernel.shmmax higher as necessary, like all available memory? Does > this limit serve only as a protection against greedy applications?)
Didn't see this get answered... The long-and-short of that there aren't
any negative consequences of having it higher, as I understand it
anyway, except the risk of greedy apps. In some cases, shared memory
can't be swapped out, which makes it a bit more risky than 'regular'
memory getting sucked up by some app.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
