On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 7:51:24 am Greg Donald wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> > Wonder if it is related to this: >> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-11/msg00098.php >> >> None of my sequences are named 'new'. What do you mean? > > I was thinking of the more generic case. The problem with 'new' in the above > bug > is that it is a reserved word and the list of reserved words recognized by > pg_dump changed in 9.0 or 9.1(?). If the table definitions you showed are > correct > you have sequence columns named id. id is in the list of reserved words also: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html
hm -- if sequences named 'id' are not dumping properly, I'd call that a pretty significant bug. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
