On 28 Jan 2012, at 15:27, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> wrote:
>> Is this a case for multi master do you think? >> I.e. running one on the internet, one locally. > > Yes, could be. > >> b) changing schemas (new tables, fields, views etc.) as well as data > > That's a tall order; I don't think anything will do that automatically, > although rubyrep claims to at least pick up new tables. OK, I guess I could treat one as 'schema master' and pg_dump schema + data across to the other once a night, once all activity has stopped and standard replication completed. > >> Any experiences/thoughts? > > My experience is with Bucardo, which should do the job admirably > (but with the data only). My advice would be to just set up a test > system and try rubyrep and Bucardo out. For the latter, use the > latest Bucardo5 beta, as Bucardo4 will be deprecated soon: > > http://bucardo.org/downloads/Bucardo-4.99.3.tar.gz Thanks, I'll do that. Oliver www.agilebase.co.uk
