Pat Heuvel <pheu...@tpg.com.au> writes: > [ vacuumlo fails ] > When I added the -v option, there were many "removing lo xxxxx" messages > before the above messages appeared. I have previously tried to reindex > pg_largeobject, but that process failed as well.
You need to get the index consistent before trying vacuumlo; that program is not designed to deal with inconsistent catalogs. What exactly happens when you try to reindex pg_largeobject? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general