Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> On 7 May 2012 09:01, Vincent de Phily <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Would be nice to see it added to the documentation (unless I just didn't find
>> it ?), as it is quite surprising, and might lead to problems if people expect
>> to be able to read sequence values from the slave.

> If you think so, please submit a patch. That's how it works here.

Any documentation patch should be written by somebody who's actually
researched the behavior a bit; in particular I believe this can be
adjusted with the sequence CACHE setting.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to