Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
> I've been working in psql a lot recently, and have started to wonder why
> statements with syntax errors or other problems that render them
> unexecutable terminate the transaction.
Well, the obvious reason is that it's hard to tell what the user meant,
so bailing is the safest response.
> I understand why statements that raise errors during their execution
> terminate a transaction,
So you're suggesting that "SELECT 1/0;" should terminate a transaction,
but "SELECT 1//0;" should not? How about "ROLBACK;"? It gets pretty
squishy pretty fast when you try to decide which sorts of errors are
more important than others.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
