Craig Ringer wrote:
On 07/11/2012 07:23 AM, Andy Chambers wrote:
I think I made a poor decision by having our application
generate checkbook numbers on demand using sequences.
Sure did. Sequences are exempt from most transactional rules;
that's why they're fast and lock-free.
This may be another case for the "gap-less" sequence (I hate that
term ... please let's call it a "uniformly-increasing sequence").
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-08/msg00744.php
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
