On 7/11/12 4:24 PM, Marcin Mańk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Ross <jr...@wykids.org
<mailto:jr...@wykids.org>> wrote:
2012-06-19 15:37:36.283752500 <www%wykids> LOG: statement: update
survey_response set srv_resp_submitted = now() where
srv_resp_srv_id = 2 and srv_resp_pp_id = 25399
jross@wykids localhost# select * from survey_response where
srv_resp_submitted is not null and srv_resp_srv_id = 2 and
srv_resp_pp_id not in (select srv_answers_pp_id from
survey_answers where srv_answers_srv_id = 2);
srv_resp_id | srv_resp_srv_id | srv_resp_pp_id | srv_resp_invite
| srv_resp_first_look | srv_resp_submitted
-------------+-----------------+----------------+----------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------
5674 | 2 | 25399 | 2012-06-19
15:12:49.589233 | 2012-06-19 15:33:05.547012 | 2012-06-19
15:38:16.724393
The timestamps don't match - something updated the record after
15:37:36 .
Also, are the fields like srv_answers_srv_id character fields? The
inserts are quoting them like varchars, which seems odd.
Greetings
Marcin
!DSPAM:4ffdfd2b110892010192983!
Yes, that was a copy / paste error that I tried to fix rather than
re-do. I explained that up thread.
I just posted the table definition but they are integer fields. As far
as the quoting of integer fields, that is the way Pear DB does inserts.
What's the harm?
Jeff
