salah jubeh <s_ju...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I am having a scenario close to the one below, I have defined a function which > depends on a view. I am able to drop the view, but my server did not complain > about the dependency. > > In the scenario below, one can drop the views a2 and a1 respectively, and > when > executing a3(), certainly an exception will be raised. I think there should be > an entry for this dependency in the pg_depend table with dependency type > normal
I think, there is no real problem, it's (for me) the same as: test=# select max(id) from table_that_does_not_exist; ERROR: relation "table_that_does_not_exist" does not exist LINE 1: select max(id) from table_that_does_not_exist; The database can't know and analyse the function-body. Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
