2012/11/23 Euler Taveira <eu...@timbira.com>:
> On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2012/11/21 Greg Sabino Mullane <g...@turnstep.com>: Separately, what are
>> the objections to raising the size limit to 128?
>>
>>> significantly larger catalog
>>
> Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument.

default 6201kB (64) updated 6967kB (128) on empty database - so it is
12% more per one database

in our warehouses we have more than 100000 relations per database and
about 1000 databases per warehouse - so these number can be
significantly higher

second issue can be increasing memory allocations for system caches
and some other place

Regards

Pavel

>
>
> --
>    Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
>    PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to