On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 23:43 +1100, Gavan Schneider wrote:
> If the money type is meant to be serious then these 
> conventions need to be followed/settable on a column by column 
> basis.

I don't like the idea of tying the semantics to a column. That leaves
out values that aren't stored in a column, e.g. literals or the results
of some expression.

Regards,
        Jeff Davis




-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to