On May 1, 2013, at 9:36 AM, "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.regis...@sympatico.ca> 
wrote:
> I have to ask myself, is it more likely that I have discovered some PG
> anomaly in 9.0 that no one has ever noticed, or that the client has
> accidentally launched the process twice and doesn't know it?

Given my (admittedly limited) experience with the PostgreSQL project and 
dealing with clients, the latter ;-)




-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to