On May 1, 2013, at 9:36 AM, "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.regis...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > I have to ask myself, is it more likely that I have discovered some PG > anomaly in 9.0 that no one has ever noticed, or that the client has > accidentally launched the process twice and doesn't know it?
Given my (admittedly limited) experience with the PostgreSQL project and dealing with clients, the latter ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general