Gavin Flower <gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: >On 18/05/13 03:06, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2013-05-16 18:35, David Kerr wrote: >> >>> - I'll take a look tomorrow, but we WERE seeing Seq Scan's against >>> - multi-million >>> - row tables, so I suspect Tom is right on with the replanning >that's in >>> - 9.2 fixing >>> - it, and I'm in the process of validating that. >>> >>> That seems likely, although you could try enable_seqscan=false as >well. >>> >>> Dave >> The 9.2 upgrade DOES fix my issue. >> >> Thanks again, Tom and everyone. >> >> >Did you also */enable_seqscan=false as well/*? > >Cheers, >Gavin
No. Same set up as 9.1 -- Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
