On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Chris Travers <chris.trav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone; > > I have been starting to experiment with the JSON accessors in 9.3. I > immediately found that my preferred use, populating nested composite types, > is not supported. Also of course one cannot manipulate JSON nodes, which > leads to the question of how best to do this. I had some ideas: > > 1. A custom C function utilizing the internal functions PostgreSQL offers > for JSON parsing (probably looking at the json_populate_record() as a base) > > 2. Utilizing hstore as an intermediate representation along with > json_each() > > 3. Perhaps using something like pl/perlu or the like. > > This leads to a few questions, including whether it would be worthwhile > looking at trying to handle nested types in json_populate_record() and if > anyone is working on such a thing currently.
Can we see a hypothetical example? json best practices for me are to use standard tables and than serialize/deserialize json as it goes through the door and not use nested composite types in your actual table definitions. I think it should all fit if you do it right: you json_[each/array_elements] the wrapping json then insert it into un-nested actual tables. If you must have a final destination as a nested composite, I think at the worst case you might have to make some transition composites... merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
