=?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogVGHFhGN6eWs=?= <golia...@polzone.pl> writes:
> Did tsearch2 dictionary caching implementation improve after 8.3 on this
> matter?
Well, there was this:
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_1_BR [3e5f9412d] 2010-10-06 19:31:05 -0400
Reduce the memory requirement for large ispell dictionaries.
This patch eliminates per-chunk palloc overhead for most small allocations
needed in the representation of an ispell dictionary. This saves close to
a factor of 2 on the current Czech ispell data. While it doesn't cover
every last small allocation in the ispell code, we are at the point of
diminishing returns, because about 95% of the allocations are covered
already.
Pavel Stehule, rather heavily revised by Tom
If you're not using ispell, it's not relevant, and I'm not sure whether
the savings were significant for anything but Czech.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
