On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:43:29PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > 1. Should this be a contrib module which provides a function, or should it
> > be a built-in piece of functionality?
> > 2. Is MD5 too heavyweight for this? Would using a non-cryptographic
> > checksum be worth the speed boost?
> > 3. Is there a risk of different architectures/versions returning different
> > checksums for tables which could be considered identical? If so, is this
> > worth worrying about?
> >
>
> Hmm - Do you really think we need an extension for something that can be
> done using query as simple as:
>
> select md5(string_agg(md5(c::text), '' order by md5(c::text))) from
> pg_class c;
Just a nitpick, and not really relevant to the OPs question,
but probably useful to people trying to actually use this
across potentially different locale settings: throw in a
DECODE(md5(...), 'hex')
for the ORDER BY like
select md5(string_agg(md5(c::text), '' order by decode(md5(c::text),
'hex'))) from pg_class c;
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
