On 12/9/2014 9:07 AM, Dara Unglaube wrote:
Is this neccessary? What is the benefit of having the archive on? Could I map a network drive from the slave to the master and set the archive_command to that mapped drive? Or what would be the best approach for this?
having a wal archive lets the slave resume after a service interruption faster, and also farther back than your wal_keep_Segments setting would otherwise allow.
having a wal archive, along with occasional base backups will let you do 'point in time recovery' (PITR) right up to a specified transaction, as long as you have a base backup from prior to that transaction and all wal archives since that base backup.
-- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
