On 01/22/2015 11:04 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
Take a look at this explain
http://explain.depesz.com/s/TTRN
I maybe missing it, but I do not see the actual query.
The final number of records is very small but PG is starting out with a
massive number of records and then filtering most of them out.
I don't want to really force pg to always use the same index because in
some cases this strategy would win but I am wondering if there is
anything I need to do in order to get the planner to make better decisions.
I already did an analyze on the table.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
