So is there a third and even faster way of doing this? On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 07:49 PM, Tim Uckun wrote: > >> I understand that there is overhead involved in parsing the strings and >> such. The amount of overhead was surprising to me but that's another >> matter. What I am really puzzled about is the difference between the >> statements >> >> EXECUTE 'INSERT INTO ' || quote_ident(partition_name) || ' SELECT >> ($1).*' USING NEW ; >> >> and >> >> EXECUTE 'INSERT INTO ' || quote_ident(partition_name) || ' VALUES >> (($1).*)' USING NEW ; >> > > > Offhand I would say because in the first case you are doing a SELECT and > in the second you are just doing a substitution. > > > >> They both do string interpolation but one is significantly faster than >> the other. Is there a third and even faster way? >> >> I am using RDS so I can't really do stored procs in C. >> >> > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.kla...@aklaver.com >
