> By and large, though, this doesn't really matter, since an empty > parent table won't cost anything much to scan. If it's significant > relative to the child table access time then you probably didn't > need partitioning in the first place.
Is there a rule of thumb as to at what size does the partitioning start performing better than non partitioned table. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
